In translation and localization services, the process of editing is important. Both human-driven translation editing and Machine Translation Post-Editing (MTPE) play significant roles, each with its own strengths, limits, and applications. The critical factor lies in understanding which approach to use in a given situation. Continue reading to explore this further.
>> Learn more about the true value of Machine Translation Post Editing
The whole process of translation and proofreading/editing in traditional services heavily relies on human linguists equipped with the industry-standard computer-assisted translation (CAT) tools to ensure consistency: the translated text should be consistent within itself and aligned with any reference materials or guidelines provided.
When editors review the translated text, they not only correct linguistic errors such as spelling, typos, grammar mistakes, and punctuation issues but also rephrase sentences to enhance the flow, improve the organization of ideas, and ensure that the target text conveys the intended message with the desired tone, aligning with the target audience.
Traditional translation editing tasks demand the expertise of a proficient and highly skilled linguist who possesses a deep understanding of both the source and target languages. Exceptional writing and communication abilities are essential. Additionally, there is often a preference, if not a requirement, to engage an editor who possesses a certain level of familiarity with the subject matter.
There are several positive aspects to traditional editing services, including the predictability and controllability of quality, cost, and turnaround time.
Traditional editing also ensures optimal resource utilization by aligning skills with the task at hand. The active collaboration between translators and editors results in positive outcomes in terms of quality, often extending across multiple languages. This improves on project efficiency and leaves a lasting impact on future releases or additions. It also enhances the team’s language skills across all projects.
A professional editor is generally expected to handle up to 6,000 words of human-made translation per day, averaging 4,500-5,000 words per day for pre-planned tasks involving uniform text. However, these figures can vary significantly depending on factors such as source and target quality, language, subject matter, text type, and number of files.
Editing human-made translations is generally faster than MTPE, as editors usually deal with only a fraction of possible mistakes. There are certain types of issues that human translators rarely make, so editors can fully concentrate on the accuracy of the translation and its style. Their job is to “polish” the translation rather than “fix” it.
While traditional editing services have their merits, it’s important to acknowledge their limitations.
However, it’s important to recognize that due to the unpredictable nature of the MTPE process, the final cost of the human approach could ultimately be lower. This is attributed to the reduced need for extensive rework and revisions inherent in MTPE.
The translation process is fully automated using industry-standard CAT tools and Machine Translation engines with varying levels of professional usability. Translation memories, glossaries, or prompts are employed to produce higher-quality output, but the approach is not standardized and may vary from one context to another, resulting in differing degrees of generated outcomes.
Machine Translation Post Editing can bring enormous benefits when integrated with robust support from Translation Memory, glossaries, and tailored prompts during output preparation. These tools not only contribute to the stability of translation outcomes but also render the MTPE process more predictable and efficient in terms of time and cost.
Due to the diverse practices employed during the output stage, MTPE faces significant limitations. These variations in approach can hinder the effectiveness and consistency of MTPE processes, leading to challenges in achieving desired translation quality and efficiency.
When dealing with high-quality MT output, the pace of work may resemble that of editing human translation.
Conversely, lower-quality MT output may significantly reduce efficiency, potentially slowing down the process to a level resembling, or even below, that of retranslation (up to 2500 words a day).
When seeking translation services, it’s common for individuals and companies to expect a combination of cost-effectiveness, rapid turnaround times, and impeccable quality, all at once. Is it true that achieving this trifecta is impossible in reality?
Achieving this ideal trifecta always requires extensive experience in working with both machine translation and human linguistics. With over 10 years of experience in game translation, proofreading, editing, and language quality assurance (LQA) projects, LocalizeDirect happily advises the clients on most optimal prioritization of goals that in turn significantly impacts preferences for services.
Besides, LocalizeDirect looks for more understanding of the motivation and background of the services choice, for example, if the editing service request involved machine translation before, which machine translation solutions are employed (free or paid), the prompt process, etc. LocalizeDirect’s clients, after discussion and reflection, hence can weigh their priorities and make informed decisions based on specific needs and situations.
Feel free to share your inquiries, and let’s start a conversation about how we can tailor a localization plan specifically to meet your service preferences.
Looking for a translation solution to efficiently handle larger volumes of texts within tight timelines and at a lower cost without compromising quality? Surprisingly, Machine Translation Post-Editing (MTPE) may not be the answer you're seeking. Read on to find out more.
